MatiasV

Left of Center Economics, Latin American History and Development, and other stuff

December 23, 2013 at 3:30pm
0 notes
It is terrific to contemplate the abysmal gulf of incomprehension that has opened itself between us and the classical economists. Only one century separates us from them: … I say a century; but even  a century after, in 1870, they did not understand it… . The classical economists said things which were perfectly true, even according to our standards of truth: they expressed them very clearly, in terse and unambiguous language, as is proved by the fact that they perfectly understood each other. We don’t understand a word of what they said: has their language been lost? Obviously not, as the English of Adam Smith is what people talk today in this country. What has happened then?
Piero Sraffa, 1927

It is terrific to contemplate the abysmal gulf of incomprehension that has opened itself between us and the classical economists. Only one century separates us from them: … I say a century; but even a century after, in 1870, they did not understand it… . The classical economists said things which were perfectly true, even according to our standards of truth: they expressed them very clearly, in terse and unambiguous language, as is proved by the fact that they perfectly understood each other. We don’t understand a word of what they said: has their language been lost? Obviously not, as the English of Adam Smith is what people talk today in this country. What has happened then?

Piero Sraffa, 1927

July 21, 2013 at 9:50am
0 notes
Washington Sq on a hot summer day

Washington Sq on a hot summer day

9:44am
0 notes
New School new bldg

New School new bldg

9:43am
0 notes
Freez/Best ice-cream in Lewisburg

Freez/Best ice-cream in Lewisburg

May 15, 2013 at 11:24am
0 notes

UP OR DOWN? A MALE ECONOMIST'S MANIFESTO ON THE TOILET SEAT ETIQUETTE CHOI 2010 Economic Inquiry Wiley Online Library →

And you ask if economics has gone down the toilet!

April 28, 2013 at 10:04am
2 notes
Reblogged from fuckyeahpierosraffa

Cambridge Capital Controversy « Economics Job Market Rumors →

fuckyeahpierosraffa:

I don’t normally post on weekends, but there’s a fascinating discussion going on right now on econjobrumors about the Cambridge Capital Controversy.

It really picks up at around page 4.

RWE stands for Real Wicksell Effects, PWE stands for Price Wicksell Effects.

March 11, 2013 at 9:17pm
802 notes
Reblogged from fylatinamericanhistory

fylatinamericanhistory:

Today In Latin American History

Ecuadorian artist Oswaldo Guayasamín died in Baltimore, Maryland on March 10, 1999 at the age of 78.

February 7, 2013 at 2:32pm
181 notes
Reblogged from fylatinamericanhistory
fylatinamericanhistory:

Bob Marley visited Brazil in March of 1980, a year before his death. Here he is playing soccer with a group of Jamaican and Brazilian musicians, including Brazilian artists Chico Buarque and Toquinho. 

fylatinamericanhistory:

Bob Marley visited Brazil in March of 1980, a year before his death. Here he is playing soccer with a group of Jamaican and Brazilian musicians, including Brazilian artists Chico Buarque and Toquinho. 

(via fylatinamericanhistory)

December 20, 2012 at 8:41pm
3 notes
Reblogged from fuckyeahpierosraffa

December 14, 2012 at 7:25am
7 notes
Reblogged from fuckyeahpierosraffa

The Meaning of Heterodox Economics and Why it Matters « Naked Keynesianism →

fuckyeahpierosraffa:

Heterodox economics is often defined as potpourri of schools, too many to mention. Further, most of these heterodox schools are defined against marginalism (or neoclassical economics, which is also a fragmented school of economic thought). In this sense, the heterodox camp is defined in a negative (against orthodox) and fragmented (depending on what aspect of orthodoxy is contested) way. I think that is a counter productive approach, and that heterodoxy should be seen as a set of principles. A positive (in its own terms) and unified (in the sense of the minimum set of propositions that are universally accepted) definition of heterodoxy is necessary.

The core beliefs of heterodox economics the essay outlines are as follows:

  1. Distribution of surplus is determined exogenously
  2. Prices do not reflect relative scarcities
  3. Output and employment are demand determined in the long run

In a nutshell:

In sum, if one believes that prices reflect, for a given technology, the way classes struggle for higher income shares within the process of reproducing the material conditions for survival (including processes in which there is accumulation), and one believes that output and the process of accumulation are driven by the exogenous forces of demand, one may be called heterodox.

Full link here http://nakedkeynesianism.blogspot.com/2011/05/meaning-of-heterodox-economics-and-why.html